How to publish a research paper?

The process of publishing a research paper is common and consists of three steps. Research activity, Paper writing and submission of paper

First you have to do research on a specific topic and then start writing the paper. The title should be eye catching and related to the research represented in the paper. Next, the abstract should provide a summary for the entire paper. It should highlight the key points and unique findings of the paper. It should be followed by literature review. The papers referred should be mentioned and the points taken should be highlighted. Next, the experimental setup or methodology should be mentioned. It should be followed by the results or discussion section. It should give at a glance findings and outputs of the paper. At last, the conclusion should summarize the entire paper. The references section is the last part of a research paper.

Once the paper is ready, the author needs to find a good journal for publication of the same. The scope of the journal should match the paper that is to be published. Unpaid journals, IEEE journals, etc. are more reputed then their counter part. Hence, selection of a journal is also important. Once the journal is selected, the author needs to prepare the paper format according to the journal requirement and submit the paper to the editor. If selected, the paper will be published in few days.


  1. Pearce, J; Derrick, B (2019). “Preliminary testing: The devil of statistics?”. Reinvention: An International Journal of Undergraduate Research12 (2). doi:10.31273/reinvention.v12i2.339.
  2. ^ Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y, Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., & Hilf, E. (2004) The green and the gold roads to Open AccessNature Web Focus.
  3. ^ Jeffery, Keith G. (2006) Open Access: An IntroductionERCIM News 64. January 2006
  4. ^ Kaufman, Marc (July 2, 2010), “Russian mathematician wins $1 million prize, but he appears to be happy with $0”Washington Post
  5. ^ Perelman, Grisha (November 11, 2002). “The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications”. arXiv:math.DG/0211159.
  6. ^ Nadejda Lobastova and Michael Hirst, “Maths genius living in poverty”, Sydney Morning Herald, August 21, 2006
  7. ^ The Amsterdam printing of the Journal des sçavans, Dibner Library of the Smithsonian Institution
  8. ^ Brown, 1972, p. 368
  9. ^ Hallam, 1842, p. 406.
  10. ^ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Vol. 1, Issue 1, is dated March 6, 1665. See also History of the Journal[permanent dead link]
  11. ^ Merton, Robert K. (December 1963). “Resistance to the Systematic Study of Multiple Discoveries in Science”. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie4 (2): 237–282. doi:10.1017/S0003975600000801ISSN 1474-0583.
  12. ^ Jinha, A. E. (2010). “Article 50 million: An estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence” (PDF). Learned Publishing23 (3): 258–263. doi:10.1087/20100308hdl:10393/19577. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-23.
  13. ^ “The History of Scientific Publishing: An interview with Aileen Fyfe” (Podcast). 2016. Archived from the original on 2017-11-08. Retrieved 2017-06-19.
  14. ^ “Five companies control more than half of academic publishing” 10 June 2015.
  15. ^ Larivière, Vincent; Haustein, Stefanie; Mongeon, Philippe (10 June 2015). “The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era”PLOS ONE10 (6): e0127502. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1027502Ldoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127502PMC 4465327PMID 26061978.
  16. Jump up to:a b Buranyi, Stephen (27 June 2017). “Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?”The GuardianISSN 0261-3077.
  17. ^ “Time to break academic publishing’s stranglehold on research”New Scientist. 21 November 2018. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  18. Jump up to:a b c McGuigan GS, Russell RD. (2008). The Business of Academic Publishing: A Strategic Analysis of the Academic Journal Publishing Industry and its Impact on the Future of Scholarly PublishingElectronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship. ICAAP.
  19. ^ Association of Research Libraries, ARL Statistics: 2004-2005 Archived 2008-12-16 at the Wayback Machine. As cited in McGuigan & Russell 2008.
  20. Jump up to:a b c Modern Language AssociationReport from the Ad Hoc Committee on the Future of Scholarly Publishing. 2002. Archived 2006-09-23 at the Wayback Machine.
  21. ^ Sample, Ian (24 April 2012). “Harvard University says it can’t afford journal publishers’ prices”The Guardian.
  22. ^ Seeking the New Normal: Periodicals Price Survey 2010 Archived 2010-09-28 at the Wayback Machine.
  23. ^ Denise Wolfe (2020-04-07). “SUNY Negotiates New, Modified Agreement with Elsevier – Libraries News Center University at Buffalo Libraries”library.buffalo.eduUniversity at Buffalo. Retrieved 2020-04-18.
  24. ^ Hendler, James (2007). “Reinventing Academic Publishing -Part 1”IEEE Intelligent Systems22 (5). doi:10.1109/MIS.2007.93S2CID 11493002.
  25. ^ Hendler, James (2008). “Reinventing Academic Publishing -Part 3”IEEE Intelligent Systems23 (1): 2–3. doi:10.1109/MIS.2008.12.
  26. ^ J. Scott Armstrong (1997). “Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness, and Innovation” (PDF). Energy & Environment3: 63–84. CiteSeerX 7920654. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-06-20.
  27. ^ Björk, Bo-Christer; Solomon, David (October 2013). “The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals”. Journal of Informetrics7 (4): 914–923. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001hdl:10138/157324.
  28. ^ Ellison, Glenn (July 2011). “Is Peer Review in Decline?”. Economic Inquiry49 (3): 635–657. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00261.xS2CID 53051479.
  29. ^ “Brief: How to Write a Concept Paper” (PDF). Hanover Grants. 2011. Archived from the original (PDF download) on 2013-06-26. Retrieved 2013-07-04. Funders often ask for brief 1- to 5-page concept papers (also called “white papers” in the government contracting sector) prior to submission of a full proposal.
  30. ^ “Format for a Concept paper”. The Gerber Foundation. 2012. Archived from the original on 2013-07-05. Retrieved 2013-07-04.
  31. ^ David A. Kronick, “Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism.” JAMA (1990) 263#10 pp: 1321-1322.
  32. ^ Wagner, Wendy Elizabeth; Steinzor, Rena (2006-07-24). Rescuing Science from Politics: Regulation and the Distortion of Scientific ResearchISBN 9780521855204 – via Google Books.
  33. ^ Mahoney, Michael J. “Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system.” Cognitive therapy and research (1977) 1#2 pp: 161-175.
  34. Jump up to:a b Iverson, Cheryl (2004). “”Copy editor” vs. “manuscript editor” vs…: venturing onto the minefield of titles” (PDF). Science Editor27 (2): 39–41. Archived from the original(PDF) on 3 December 2010. Retrieved 19 November 2013.
  35. ^ de Jager, Marije. Journal copy-editing in a non-anglophone environment. In: Matarese, Valerie (ed) (2013). Supporting Research Writing: Roles and challenges in multilingual settings. Oxford: Chandos. pp. 157–171. ISBN 978-1843346661.
  36. ^ Weber-Wulff, D. (2019). A Breakdown in Communication: Journal Reactions to Information about Plagiarism and Duplicate Publications. Paper presented at the 6th World Conference on Research Integrity (WCRI) 2019.
  37. ^ Eaton, Sarah Elaine; Crossman, Katherine (2018). “Self-Plagiarism Research Literature in the Social Sciences: A Scoping Review”Interchange49 (3): 285–311. doi:10.1007/s10780-018-9333-6ISSN 0826-4805.
  38. ^ Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: Office of Research Integrity Retrieved from
  39. ^ Ware, Mark and Michael Wabe. (2012) [1] The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Publishing. Outsell and the International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, November 2012.
  40. ^ Patterson, David (University of California, Berkeley); Snyder, Lawrence; Ullma, Jeffrey (August 1999). “Evaluating Computer Scientists and Engineers For Promotion and Tenure” (Free PDF download). Computing Research News. Computing Research Association. Retrieved 2013-07-04.
  41. ^ Grudin, Jonathan (April 2–7, 2005). “Why CHI Fragmented”. CHI ’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. Portland, Oregon: ACM Press. pp. 1083–1084. doi:10.1145/1056808.1056822.
  42. ^ Joel Best, “Following the Money Across the Landscape of Sociology Journals.” The American Sociologist (2015): 1-16.
  43. ^ Cathy Davidson, “The futures of scholarly publishing.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing(2015).
  44. ^ Miller, Toby (2012). Blow Up the Humanities. Temple University Press. ISBN 9781439909836.
  45. ^
  46. ^ “Oxford Open”Oxford Academic Journals.
  47. ^ “Open Access”Wiley. Retrieved 22 May 2019.
  48. ^ “Open Choice”Springer.
  49. ^ Zaken, Ministerie van Buitenlandse. “All European scientific articles to be freely accessible by 2020” Retrieved 2016-05-28.
  50. ^ “Competitiveness Council, 26-27/05/2016 – Consilium” Retrieved 2016-05-28.
  51. ^ MacKenzie, Debora (2010-02-18). “Iran showing fastest scientific growth of any country”Science in Society. New Scientist (online magazine). Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  52. ^ “2005 OST PSA report” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-07-21. Retrieved 2012-10-02.
  53. ^ “Bulletin Board – Which nation’s scientific output is rising fastest?”. IPM. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  54. Jump up to:a b David Dickson (2004-07-16). “China, Brazil and India lead southern science output”. SciDev.Net. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  55. ^ China poised to overhaul US as biggest publisher of scientific papers, Alok Jha, Monday 28 March 2011, The Guardian,
  56. ^ Beverungen, Armin; Böhm, Steffen; Land, Christopher (2012). “The Poverty of Journal Publishing” (PDF). Organization19 (6): 929–938. doi:10.1177/1350508412448858S2CID 145686977.
  57. Jump up to:a b c d e f Vanholsbeeck, Marc; Thacker, Paul; Sattler, Susanne; Ross-Hellauer, Tony; Rivera-López, Bárbara S.; Rice, Curt; Nobes, Andy; Masuzzo, Paola; Martin, Ryan; Kramer, Bianca; Havemann, Johanna; Enkhbayar, Asura; Davila, Jacinto; Crick, Tom; Crane, Harry; Tennant, Jonathan P. (2019-03-11). “Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing”Publications7 (2): 34. doi:10.3390/publications7020034.
  58. ^ Luzón, María José (2007). “The Added Value Features of Online Scholarly Journals”. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication37: 59–73. doi:10.2190/H702-6473-8569-2R3QS2CID 62152187.
  59. ^ Anderson, Kent (2018-02-06). “Focusing on Value — 102 Things Journal Publishers Do (2018 Update)”. Scholarly Kitchen.
  60. ^ Van Noorden, Richard (2013). “Open Access: The True Cost of Science Publishing”Nature495 (7442): 426–429. Bibcode:2013Natur.495..426Vdoi:10.1038/495426aPMID 23538808.
  61. ^ Inchcoombe, Steven (2017). “The changing role of research publishing: A case study from Springer Nature”Insights: The UKSG Journal30 (2): 13–19. doi:10.1629/uksg.355.
  62. ^ De Camargo, Kenneth R. (2014). “Big Publishing and the Economics of Competition”American Journal of Public Health104 (1): 8–10. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301719PMC 3910061PMID 24228678.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *